找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 1188|回复: 5

[灌水] 美国人民真是既穷又傻

[复制链接]
发表于 2010-10-4 04:40 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


2010 edition of The Financial Engines National 401(k) Evaluation
http://corp.financialengines.com ... nal401kEval2010.pdf

* Total Number of Participants in Sample: 2,854,752
* Total Plan Assets: $211 billion
* Average Salary: $65,536
* Median Salary: $53,852
* Average Acct. Balance: $77,464
* Median Acct. Balance: $29,390

Across the entire sample, 72% participants are not on track to comfortably retire by age 65. In addition, 34% have inefficient portfolios and/or inappropriate risk levels, 23% of participants with company stock as a plan option hold too much of it, and 39% of participants are not contributing enough to their 401(k)s to receive the full employer match.
发表于 2010-10-4 06:30 PM | 显示全部楼层
contributing max != make more in the long run.

do the math

评分

1

查看全部评分

回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-4 07:14 PM | 显示全部楼层
contributing max != make more in the long run.

do the math
ppteam 发表于 2010-10-4 20:30



First all, it's not talking about "contributing MAX", it's about full employer match. For example, my company matches 50% of my contribution up to 6% of my salary, i.e., I can  get this 3% of my salary "free", if and only if I contribute >= 6% of my salary.
I have difficulty to understand why someone just does not pick up the free money.

As to the maximum contribution (2010 limit $16500), I cannot find anything better to save me several grains of tax.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-10-4 07:53 PM | 显示全部楼层
[img][/img]
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-10-4 08:16 PM | 显示全部楼层
Average Salary: $65,536
很有钱吗。。。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-10-5 10:33 AM | 显示全部楼层
回复 3# Whigs


    $16,500x50%=$8,250=$137,500x6%=$275,000x3%

$275,000 x 6% =$16,500
$275,000 x 3% =$8,250

Wow, your salary $275,000? or $137,500?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2025-6-26 08:17 PM , Processed in 0.066888 second(s), 16 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表