找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 997|回复: 14

[灌水] 美海军驶入南海人造岛12海哩 - TG又要认怂?

[复制链接]
发表于 2015-10-26 09:01 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


本帖最后由 lite1067 于 2015-10-26 09:02 PM 编辑

对市场会有什么影响?


WASHINGTON—A U.S. Navy destroyer sailed within 12 nautical miles of artificial islands claimed by China, in a direct challenge to Beijing that raises the stakes in an expanding, multination territorial dispute.

An American defense official confirmed Monday that the U.S. Navy ship navigated through the waters around at least one of the land masses to which China lays claim within the Spratly chain of islands in the South China Sea, crossing an area that China maintains is part of its sovereign territory.

International convention allows countries to claim territorial waters within 12 nautical miles of their coastal territory, but the U.S. and many other countries don’t recognize China’s claims to almost all of the South China Sea. Thus U.S. officials labeled Monday’s operation a “freedom of navigation” exercise.

Several U.S. defense officials said the navigation through the islands wasn’t a one-time operation, and that the U.S. Navy would continue to sail through waters claimed by Beijing.

China’s foreign ministry didn’t immediately respond to a request to comment but Beijing has often said that it has “undisputable sovereignty” over all the islands of the South China Sea and their adjacent waters. It says the artificial islands it has been building will be used for civilian activities, such as weather monitoring and search and rescue, as well as for military purposes.

While the U.S. has long said it doesn't take sides in the territorial dispute over the Spratlys, the American ship’s passage through the area is significant as a signal of Washington’s view that some of China’s artificial islands have no right to territorial waters because they were built on reefs that used to be submerged at high tide.

President Barack Obama has pledged to uphold the right of American vessels to travel through international waters despite what the U.S. sees as unfounded claims by other countries, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Monday.

“This is a critically important principle, particularly in the South China Sea, because there are billions of dollars of commerce that flow through that region of the world every year, and maybe even more than that,” Mr. Earnest said.

Defense Secretary Ash Carter, who has publicly scolded Beijing for its island-building campaign, has been blunt on the issue, saying the U.S. would sail its ships wherever and whenever it wants within international waters. Senior U.S. military officials, including Adm. Harry Harris, the head of U.S. Pacific Command, have urged the U.S. to proceed with the operation.

“I agree that the South China Sea is no more China’s than the Gulf of Mexico is Mexico’s,” Adm. Harris told a Senate panel in September. “I think that we must exercise our freedom of navigation throughout the region.”

But despite long-standing expectations of a White House signal to Beijing, the National Security Council hadn’t given the go-ahead until now. Some believed the White House wanted to wait until Mr. Xi’s visit to Washington concluded last month.

The dispute has simmered most of this year as the American military has watched China expand the chain of islands in the South China Sea by using dredged material from the ocean floor to build or expand islands, using submerged reefs and rocks.

China has amassed thousands of acres of these man-made structures, according to a Pentagon report issued in August. Beijing says the islands are for both military and nonmilitary use, including to house fishermen.

But defense officials believe Beijing’s ambitions are more alarming, and point to China’s construction of airstrips, military facilities like barracks and ports.

In May, The Wall Street Journal reported that Beijing’s military, the People’s Liberation Army, had placed mobile artillery units atop one of the islands, known as Johnson Reef. Those artillery units have since been removed or obscured from view.

In September, Mr. Xi surprised U.S. officials on his visit to Washington by declaring that China didn’t “intend to militarize” the islands. But his statement has remained puzzling since Beijing has done little to clarify his remarks.

Washington fears that Beijing will use the islands for military purposes that could cause instability in one of the world’s busiest commercial shipping routes, with as much as $5 trillion annually passing through the region.

In September, a flotilla of five Chinese warships came within 12 nautical miles of the Aleutian Islands in the Bering Sea, a rare foray into U.S. territorial waters. Defense Department officials said Sept. 6 that the Chinese navy ships had passed through the waters but they had complied with international law and didn’t act in any threatening way.

The ships undertook what is known as “innocent passage,” a legal concept in which ships pass through another nation’s territorial waters. But the passage was seen as significant at the time given that Beijing has long objected to the U.S. Navy transiting China’s territorial waters without prior permission or even sailing near them.

That Chinese passage though the Aleutians was different from the U.S. operation Monday in the South China Sea because “innocent passage” by a U.S. ship in the area could imply recognition that China has territorial waters there.
发表于 2015-10-26 09:53 PM | 显示全部楼层
你们米国佬弄得TG没有台阶下,这是要把兔子逼急了哈。我就撞你一下,你怎么着?还派航妈过来跟我打?打就打,who怕who。可惜,我猜TG没这个胆,估计认怂。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-26 10:09 PM | 显示全部楼层
Cobra 发表于 2015-10-26 09:53 PM
你们米国佬弄得TG没有台阶下,这是要把兔子逼急了哈。我就撞你一下,你怎么着?还派航妈过来跟我打?打就打 ...

老蛇,你不是美国佬?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-26 10:10 PM | 显示全部楼层
不会被共军的渔船包围了吧,周围布上渔网,进退不得,那就好看了。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-26 10:25 PM | 显示全部楼层
恒一 发表于 2015-10-26 10:09 PM
老蛇,你不是美国佬?

Nope

点评

I see. North to the Lakes.  发表于 2015-10-26 10:29 PM
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-26 10:39 PM | 显示全部楼层
兔子在下一盘很大的棋。你们根本看不到那个高度。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-26 10:46 PM | 显示全部楼层
坚决不认怂,我们口头严重严重非常严重的抗议!当然,下次不为例了。哈哈。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-26 10:51 PM | 显示全部楼层
这就是恐怖主义的起源。
美国自恃武力强大,所以为所欲为,使馆都炸了不也没什么。
国家关系就像人与人之间关系一样,  但是人与人之间还有法律来保护弱者,国与国之间就没有人能管。
打不过又咽不下这口气怎么办?恐怖主义是最好的办法。就好比我打不过你,我可以打你孩子老婆。
生活中有没有这样的事?

如果多一点恐怖主义, 美国会收敛点吧?
听起来疯狂,其实有道理的。


点评

有一定道理。中国大国面子,不会搞恐怖的。不过真是怂啊。  发表于 2015-10-26 10:53 PM
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-26 11:25 PM | 显示全部楼层
novice_trader 发表于 2015-10-26 10:46 PM
坚决不认怂,我们口头严重严重非常严重的抗议!当然,下次不为例了。哈哈。

评分

1

查看全部评分

回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-27 12:20 AM | 显示全部楼层
tnnd
兵熊熊一个,将熊熊一窝
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-27 04:53 AM | 显示全部楼层
TG 已经在奥巴马访问阿拉斯加时,通过白令海峡12海里以内,显示了实力。应该是双方持平了。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-27 06:35 AM | 显示全部楼层
China's Foreign Ministry said in a statement Tuesday that the vessel "illegally entered into the waters of China's Spratly Islands."

"The action taken by the U.S. warship has threatened China's sovereignty and security interest, and has put the safety of personnel on the reefs in danger," the ministry said.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-27 06:45 AM | 显示全部楼层
都是演戏给各自的屁民看,美国作为老大不展示下如何能行?中国的崛起不可阻挡,眼前吃点瘪也没啥。何况中国舰艇前阵子也刚过这事,这场子美国肯定要找回来的。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-27 06:47 AM | 显示全部楼层
对市场都没啥影响,可见没人当回事儿
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2015-10-27 02:14 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2025-8-6 06:35 AM , Processed in 0.063504 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表