|
楼主 |
发表于 2013-9-24 05:45 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 jamesmith 于 2013-9-24 07:55 PM 编辑
水明善 发表于 2013-9-24 01:49 PM 
just read today's WSJ, some concerns:
1. audit may bring with uncertainty;
2. the buyer needs to r ...
Yes, all are valid concerns. When I checked early today, news said BBRY's founder with 6% stake didn't respond for comment. So I don't know if the founder is in the deal with Fairfax. New bidders are unlikely that's why Fairfax's bid price is so low. There is uncertainly, that's why the price gap widened from $9 today.
Let me try to explain my reasoning.
1. I see the uncertainty during due diligence period to be low. Fairfax bought Blackbery at Q3, 2010 and continuously added.
Period Shares % of Portfolio Activity
2013 Q2 51,854,700 22.71
2013 Q1 51,854,700 29.04
2012 Q4 51,854,700 25.54
2012 Q3 51,854,700 20.89 Add
2012 Q2 26,848,500 10.97
2012 Q1 26,848,500 18.72 Add
2011 Q4 12,798,300 10.64 Add
2011 Q3 11,798,300 12.29 Add
2011 Q2 8,373,300 8.88 Add
2011 Q1 2,065,000 4.18
2010 Q4 2,065,000 4.74
2010 Q3 2,065,000 5.08 Buy
It is one of the largest position in their public equity portfolio. Prem Watsa was on the board of Blackberry until August this year. They have a good understanding of what they are bidding for. Some people on Seeking Alpha think Prem Watsa is bluffing and trying to get new bidders, I don't think this is the case. Imagine we are at his place owning 10% of BBRY, why would we bluff? knowing it is unlikely to get new bidders. Fairfax wants to buy the whole thing cheap at $9. They added a termination penalty that goes up to $262 million if BBRY back out of the deal with a new bidder, this makes it even harder to get new bidders, because new bid have to be considerably higher to be attractive to shareholders. If he is trying to get new bidder by bluffing, such term should not have been setup. Also Prem Watsa is considered by many the Warren Buffett of Canada, I don't think he will risk his reputation by bluffing this deal.
2. Prem Watsa doesn't wants to contribute anymore of Fairfax's cash to the deal and very likely that all the financing will be done using BBRY's asset as collateral(typical leveraged buyout). We don't know who else is in the deal, let's assume only Fairfax is in it. They have 10% of BBRY, and BBRY have $2B cash that can be used in the deal (it has to keep some cash to operate). That means $4.7B - 0.1*$4.7B - $2B = $2.23B must be borrowed against BBRY's asset. Using most recent data, Blackberry's book value = $9.399B, minus the $2B cash we took for the deal, that gives us $7.399B. Not an expert on this area, but I believe there is a good chance to borrw $2.23B using $7.399B asset as collateral.
3. Yes, general consensus is that there will be no higher bidder.
I used the simple calculation:
Expected Value = probability of deal * gain - probability of no deal * loss
Annualized return = expected value * 12 / month it takes to complete
Of course everybody have different estimates, we can plug in our estimates and decide for ourselves if this is a acceptable investment/bet. My estimates might be too optimistic, a safer way to do this is to wait till Friday's earning report comes out. Then we can have a clearer picture of Blackberry's Balance sheet.
How low can Blackberry go if the deal doesn't go through? This downside risk is lessened by Friday's big price drop. My estimate for worst case scenario is cash (2.5 B) + patent(3.3 B) /3 = $3.6B or roughly $6.89 per share. I believe I will be able to get out above $6.89 per share if deal doesn't go through. That gives us a max loss of $1.71 per share.
With this new loss, expected return changes to 2.2% or 6.59% annualized. |
评分
-
1
查看全部评分
-
|