中国经济，快不等于好，慢不等于差(from Economist)

Diffusion

版权关系，转贴两段。

However, just as fast growth masked underlying strains, so China’s disappointing growth has obscured two encouraging trends that may matter hugely for China’s future. Consumption, although still low, made a bigger contribution than investment to China’s growth in the first quarter. That sustains a break with investment-led growth that dates back to 2011. Even more notable, services have trumped industry’s contribution to GDP in the past three quarters and have almost matched it over the past four—which has not happened since the 1960s.

In short China is modernising, becoming more like a Western economy, with consumers and services to the fore. And these two promising trends reinforce each other. Because services are more labour-intensive than industry, their growth boosts wages and household income. Fatter pay-packets then encourage consumption, and consumer spending, in turn, favours services. In economic life, as one economist has put it, “Result becomes cause and cause becomes result.”

calgarian

很好，我喜欢

dxzhu

kurdamm

所以说一个消息，多种看法，主要是花街MM如何解读的问题。

calgarian

kurdamm 发表于 2013-4-18 05:58 PM
所以说一个消息，多种看法，主要是花街MM如何解读的问题。

这就是现在的矛盾，为什么非要听花街的

Diffusion

kurdamm 发表于 2013-4-18 05:58 PM
所以说一个消息，多种看法，主要是花街MM如何解读的问题。

这篇文章的看法是消费好于制造。所以BIDU, QIHU之类的将来表现会好。至于花街，换仓需要时间，也需要空间。。。

Diffusion

calgarian 发表于 2013-4-18 06:01 PM
这就是现在的矛盾，为什么非要听花街的

资本市场，谁口袋深，听谁的。

kurdamm

这篇文章的看法是消费好于制造。所以BIDU, QIHU之类的将来表现会好。至于花街，换仓需要时间，也需要空间。。。

，国家越发达，服务行业占GDP的比重就该越大。好像是这么讲的。天朝在朝这个方向发展。

calgarian

Diffusion 发表于 2013-4-18 06:05 PM
资本市场，谁口袋深，听谁的。

可能以后要听金融街的

cat2011

Kami

milan1126

非常同意这个观点~

小呵呵

好事
不是说这届政府的目标是工资翻一番，如果实现了，内需gdp、综合国力也就跟着翻一番了。